<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word 2007 for Writers: Part 3 &#8211; Master Documents and Outlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-2007-for-writers-part-3-master-documents-and-outlines/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-2007-for-writers-part-3-master-documents-and-outlines</link>
	<description>Tools, Tips, and Technology for Productive Writers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 07:34:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-2007-for-writers-part-3-master-documents-and-outlines/comment-page-1#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-2007-for-writers-part-3-master-documents-and-outlines#comment-884</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m showing my age here, but I remember when master documents DID work, and it was in Word 5.0. Yes, the DOS version of Word! This was back before some #$!$%$%$^ at Microsoft decided to do away with style sheets and go to the mess we know today as &quot;templates.&quot; Style sheets worked because they were a simple but powerful tagging system for formatting content. Back then, master / sub documents were even portable, because, if the master and subs were all in a single folder, the master didn&#039;t include path information in the sub doc references. The mess Microsoft has made of what should be a simple referencing paradigm is outrageous. Word has gone backward with nearing every release since then in terms of its usefulness for professional writers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m showing my age here, but I remember when master documents DID work, and it was in Word 5.0. Yes, the DOS version of Word! This was back before some #$!$%$%$^ at Microsoft decided to do away with style sheets and go to the mess we know today as &#8220;templates.&#8221; Style sheets worked because they were a simple but powerful tagging system for formatting content. Back then, master / sub documents were even portable, because, if the master and subs were all in a single folder, the master didn&#8217;t include path information in the sub doc references. The mess Microsoft has made of what should be a simple referencing paradigm is outrageous. Word has gone backward with nearing every release since then in terms of its usefulness for professional writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteB</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-2007-for-writers-part-3-master-documents-and-outlines/comment-page-1#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-2007-for-writers-part-3-master-documents-and-outlines#comment-879</guid>
		<description>Hi Dustin,
Have you ran into all the problems people report with Master Documents in Word?  See links.  I have plenty of problems with multi-level outline numbering and when I try to combine that with Master documents is gets worse.
Pete

Not sure if this link will come through...
http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/wizard.mspx?&amp;query=word+master+documents&amp;lang=en&amp;cr=US&amp;guid=&amp;sloc=en-us&amp;dg=microsoft.public.word.docmanagement&amp;p=1&amp;tid=fe0fbeb2-66e8-42dd-83fc-a048a2da3715

Some text from it:
&quot;
The master document feature has been broken in *every* version of Word 
since the feature was first introduced. In short, using the feature almost 
inevitably results in all or part of the document becoming hopelessly 
corrupted. Many could benefit from a trustworthy master document feature. My 
reading is that the OP needs the feature and wishes for a version of Word in 
which it works reliably. 

Because of the new file format, I had high hopes for master documents in 
Word 2007. Unfortunately, the last time I checked (SP1), the feature was 
still broken (i.e., still spontaneously corrupting documents). I have not 
ventured into master documents in Word 2007 SP2, but I&#039;ve read nothing that 
suggests it was one of the fixes. 

For more on why master documents should be avoided by people who value their 
documents, see: 

http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/WhyMasterDocsCorrupt.htm 

John McGhie also points to an article describing a &quot;safe&quot; way to use master documents. IMO, the rules that need to be followed to avoid corruption are very difficult to enforce when working with a group of authors, and not all that easy to follow when working alone. In any case, master documents need to be made unbreakable and robust before they can be used with reliability and confidence.
&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dustin,<br />
Have you ran into all the problems people report with Master Documents in Word?  See links.  I have plenty of problems with multi-level outline numbering and when I try to combine that with Master documents is gets worse.<br />
Pete</p>
<p>Not sure if this link will come through&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/wizard.mspx?&amp;query=word+master+documents&amp;lang=en&amp;cr=US&amp;guid=&amp;sloc=en-us&amp;dg=microsoft.public.word.docmanagement&amp;p=1&amp;tid=fe0fbeb2-66e8-42dd-83fc-a048a2da3715" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/wizard.mspx?&amp;query=word+master+documents&amp;lang=en&amp;cr=US&amp;guid=&amp;sloc=en-us&amp;dg=microsoft.public.word.docmanagement&amp;p=1&amp;tid=fe0fbeb2-66e8-42dd-83fc-a048a2da3715</a></p>
<p>Some text from it:<br />
&#8220;<br />
The master document feature has been broken in *every* version of Word<br />
since the feature was first introduced. In short, using the feature almost<br />
inevitably results in all or part of the document becoming hopelessly<br />
corrupted. Many could benefit from a trustworthy master document feature. My<br />
reading is that the OP needs the feature and wishes for a version of Word in<br />
which it works reliably. </p>
<p>Because of the new file format, I had high hopes for master documents in<br />
Word 2007. Unfortunately, the last time I checked (SP1), the feature was<br />
still broken (i.e., still spontaneously corrupting documents). I have not<br />
ventured into master documents in Word 2007 SP2, but I&#8217;ve read nothing that<br />
suggests it was one of the fixes. </p>
<p>For more on why master documents should be avoided by people who value their<br />
documents, see: </p>
<p><a href="http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/WhyMasterDocsCorrupt.htm" rel="nofollow">http://word.mvps.org/faqs/general/WhyMasterDocsCorrupt.htm</a> </p>
<p>John McGhie also points to an article describing a &#8220;safe&#8221; way to use master documents. IMO, the rules that need to be followed to avoid corruption are very difficult to enforce when working with a group of authors, and not all that easy to follow when working alone. In any case, master documents need to be made unbreakable and robust before they can be used with reliability and confidence.<br />
&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-2007-for-writers-part-3-master-documents-and-outlines/comment-page-1#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-2007-for-writers-part-3-master-documents-and-outlines#comment-780</guid>
		<description>Very useful - much better than Microsoft&#039;s own Web site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful - much better than Microsoft&#8217;s own Web site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Links&#160;&#124;&#160;missional. glocal. cultural. theological.</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-2007-for-writers-part-3-master-documents-and-outlines/comment-page-1#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Links&#160;&#124;&#160;missional. glocal. cultural. theological.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-2007-for-writers-part-3-master-documents-and-outlines#comment-362</guid>
		<description>[...] Word 2007 for Writers: Part 3 - Master Documents and Outlines [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Word 2007 for Writers: Part 3 - Master Documents and Outlines [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
