<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word Passive Voice Highlighting Revisited: Now for Word 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003</link>
	<description>Tools, Tips, and Technology for Productive Writers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 07:34:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Global Language Monitor&#8217;s debate analysis nonsense (Part 2) &#171; Motivated Grammar</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Language Monitor&#8217;s debate analysis nonsense (Part 2) &#171; Motivated Grammar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-537</guid>
		<description>[...] evasive, too wimpy.  Strunk &amp; White opposed it, George Orwell opposed it, and Microsoft Word opposes it.  It&#8217;s opposed by just about any prescriptivist you can find shouting drivel.  According to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] evasive, too wimpy.  Strunk &amp; White opposed it, George Orwell opposed it, and Microsoft Word opposes it.  It&#8217;s opposed by just about any prescriptivist you can find shouting drivel.  According to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoover</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Both these examples are active voice. They have different but equally valid meanings. The Fonz was standing against the wall is past continuous (imperfect tense). It allows you to create a context for other events.  (e.g. &#039;when Joanie arrived, the Fonz was standing against the wall&#039; means he was already there when she arrived).

The Fonz stood against the wall is past tense. It&#039;s ambiguous on its own, but clear in context (e.g. &#039;when Joanie arrived, the Fonz stood against the wall&#039; means he wasn&#039;t standing against the wall when she arrived but did so soon after).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both these examples are active voice. They have different but equally valid meanings. The Fonz was standing against the wall is past continuous (imperfect tense). It allows you to create a context for other events.  (e.g. &#8216;when Joanie arrived, the Fonz was standing against the wall&#8217; means he was already there when she arrived).</p>
<p>The Fonz stood against the wall is past tense. It&#8217;s ambiguous on its own, but clear in context (e.g. &#8216;when Joanie arrived, the Fonz stood against the wall&#8217; means he wasn&#8217;t standing against the wall when she arrived but did so soon after).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Hendrix</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Hendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-371</guid>
		<description>For Word on Mac OS X:

Use the directions for Word 2007 to highlight the phrases you want. If you have trouble getting the highlighting to &quot;stick,&quot; try changing the highlight color while the Find window is still open (and before clicking on the document itself).

To remove the highlighting, simply set highlight color to None, then Select All (Command + A) and hit the highlight button (in the Formatting Toolbar).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Word on Mac OS X:</p>
<p>Use the directions for Word 2007 to highlight the phrases you want. If you have trouble getting the highlighting to &#8220;stick,&#8221; try changing the highlight color while the Find window is still open (and before clicking on the document itself).</p>
<p>To remove the highlighting, simply set highlight color to None, then Select All (Command + A) and hit the highlight button (in the Formatting Toolbar).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Stephanie: Added the link. I meant to do it when I was writing the post but I forgot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephanie: Added the link. I meant to do it when I was writing the post but I forgot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-369</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not about who is doing the action, I think, but about what the action is. In the first, the verb is &quot;to be&quot;; it tells us something about the way Fonzie is. The second tells us what he&#039;s doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not about who is doing the action, I think, but about what the action is. In the first, the verb is &#8220;to be&#8221;; it tells us something about the way Fonzie is. The second tells us what he&#8217;s doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProfessorWalrus</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessorWalrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-368</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Fonz was standing against the wall.&quot; &quot;The Fonz stood against the wall.&quot; are both active. In both situations &#039;The Fonz&#039; is the one doing the action. Neither of them are passive, at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="dquo">&#8220;</span>The Fonz was standing against the wall.&#8221; &#8220;The Fonz stood against the wall.&#8221; are both active. In both situations &#8216;The Fonz&#8217; is the one doing the action. Neither of them are passive, at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-367</guid>
		<description>GREAT tip.  Maybe link from here to the 2007 article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT tip.  Maybe link from here to the 2007 article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-366</guid>
		<description>I was inspired to comment merely because the Fonz was referenced.

Er...

You inspired me to comment merely by referencing the Fonz.

Ayyyyy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was inspired to comment merely because the Fonz was referenced.</p>
<p>Er&#8230;</p>
<p>You inspired me to comment merely by referencing the Fonz.</p>
<p>Ayyyyy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Happens to an Author When She Finishes Editing? &#187; Worderella Writes</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>What Happens to an Author When She Finishes Editing? &#187; Worderella Writes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-365</guid>
		<description>[...] (Need help discovering passive writing? The Writer&#8217;s Technology Companion wrote a tutorial to highlight passive writing in Microsoft Word 2003.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (Need help discovering passive writing? The Writer&#8217;s Technology Companion wrote a tutorial to highlight passive writing in Microsoft Word 2003.) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
