<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word Passive Voice Highlighting Revisited: Now for Word 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003</link>
	<description>Tools, Tips, and Technology for Productive Writers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:31:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A College Student</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>A College Student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 06:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>wow people. Seriously this is an article on how to filter passive voice, not a blog for OCD English freaks. Thank you for the article Dustin, its a great help to me that i now know how to filter passive words from my essay writing. Obviously if you are searching for a way to filter passive you know what passive is. Therefore you are not too awfully confused by the two sentences. I dont really know what to say here other than Thank You to the writer of the article and &quot;wow&quot; to the detractors. Maybe you are all the undergrad students grading my papers and have nothing better to do than troll the internet and show off your highly superior English knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow people. Seriously this is an article on how to filter passive voice, not a blog for OCD English freaks. Thank you for the article Dustin, its a great help to me that i now know how to filter passive words from my essay writing. Obviously if you are searching for a way to filter passive you know what passive is. Therefore you are not too awfully confused by the two sentences. I dont really know what to say here other than Thank You to the writer of the article and “wow” to the detractors. Maybe you are all the undergrad students grading my papers and have nothing better to do than troll the internet and show off your highly superior English knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea Saunders</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>The point of the past progressive is that it gives background information before the action starts.  &quot;I was doing my homework when my friend called.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of the past progressive is that it gives background information before the action starts.  “I was doing my homework when my friend called.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Wax</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Wax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>Yes, I am an idiot. 

That said, I&#039;m starting to think that the passive voice doesn&#039;t exist outside the famous example, &quot;mistakes were made&quot;. There is a quite well-known take-down of Strunk and White which makes the case that not a single of their passive voice examples are actually passive voice. 

Oh well.

Here&#039;s the thing: phrases that de-emphasize the agent are boring. Phrases where the subject passively receives the action are boring. Phrases that describe the subject&#039;s behaviors as a state of their being, rather than as an action, are boring. &quot;He was standing&quot; -- standing is a thing he was, not an action he did; &quot;he stood&quot; is much more active and interesting. 

Call it -- and me -- what you will. The bottom line is that if you&#039;re using &quot;is&quot; statements in every sentence, you&#039;re boring the crap out of me. And probably most of your other, non-me readers as well. Even though Strunk and White were idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I am an idiot. </p>
<p>That said, I’m starting to think that the passive voice doesn’t exist outside the famous example, “mistakes were made”. There is a quite well-known take-down of Strunk and White which makes the case that not a single of their passive voice examples are actually passive voice. </p>
<p>Oh well.</p>
<p>Here’s the thing: phrases that de-emphasize the agent are boring. Phrases where the subject passively receives the action are boring. Phrases that describe the subject’s behaviors as a state of their being, rather than as an action, are boring. “He was standing” — standing is a thing he was, not an action he did; “he stood” is much more active and interesting. </p>
<p>Call it — and me — what you will. The bottom line is that if you’re using “is” statements in every sentence, you’re boring the crap out of me. And probably most of your other, non-me readers as well. Even though Strunk and White were idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea Saunders</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 06:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>Are you an idiot?  &quot;He was standing against the wall,&quot; is not passive voice.  It&#039;s past progressive.  Passive voice uses past participles.  &quot;Standing&quot; is a present participles, not a past participle.  Passive voice would be like, &quot;He was stood against the wall,&quot; stupidly implying that he is paralyzed or something and some other person leaned him up against the wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you an idiot?  “He was standing against the wall,” is not passive voice.  It’s past progressive.  Passive voice uses past participles.  “Standing” is a present participles, not a past participle.  Passive voice would be like, “He was stood against the wall,” stupidly implying that he is paralyzed or something and some other person leaned him up against the wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Language Monitor&#8217;s debate analysis nonsense (Part 2) &#171; Motivated Grammar</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Language Monitor&#8217;s debate analysis nonsense (Part 2) &#171; Motivated Grammar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-537</guid>
		<description>[...] evasive, too wimpy.  Strunk &amp; White opposed it, George Orwell opposed it, and Microsoft Word opposes it.  It&#8217;s opposed by just about any prescriptivist you can find shouting drivel.  According to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] evasive, too wimpy.  Strunk &amp; White opposed it, George Orwell opposed it, and Microsoft Word opposes it.  It’s opposed by just about any prescriptivist you can find shouting drivel.  According to […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoover</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Both these examples are active voice. They have different but equally valid meanings. The Fonz was standing against the wall is past continuous (imperfect tense). It allows you to create a context for other events.  (e.g. &#039;when Joanie arrived, the Fonz was standing against the wall&#039; means he was already there when she arrived).

The Fonz stood against the wall is past tense. It&#039;s ambiguous on its own, but clear in context (e.g. &#039;when Joanie arrived, the Fonz stood against the wall&#039; means he wasn&#039;t standing against the wall when she arrived but did so soon after).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both these examples are active voice. They have different but equally valid meanings. The Fonz was standing against the wall is past continuous (imperfect tense). It allows you to create a context for other events.  (e.g. ‘when Joanie arrived, the Fonz was standing against the wall’ means he was already there when she arrived).</p>
<p>The Fonz stood against the wall is past tense. It’s ambiguous on its own, but clear in context (e.g. ‘when Joanie arrived, the Fonz stood against the wall’ means he wasn’t standing against the wall when she arrived but did so soon after).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Hendrix</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Hendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-371</guid>
		<description>For Word on Mac OS X:

Use the directions for Word 2007 to highlight the phrases you want. If you have trouble getting the highlighting to &quot;stick,&quot; try changing the highlight color while the Find window is still open (and before clicking on the document itself).

To remove the highlighting, simply set highlight color to None, then Select All (Command + A) and hit the highlight button (in the Formatting Toolbar).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Word on Mac OS X:</p>
<p>Use the directions for Word 2007 to highlight the phrases you want. If you have trouble getting the highlighting to “stick,” try changing the highlight color while the Find window is still open (and before clicking on the document itself).</p>
<p>To remove the highlighting, simply set highlight color to None, then Select All (Command + A) and hit the highlight button (in the Formatting Toolbar).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Stephanie: Added the link. I meant to do it when I was writing the post but I forgot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephanie: Added the link. I meant to do it when I was writing the post but I forgot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-369</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not about who is doing the action, I think, but about what the action is. In the first, the verb is &quot;to be&quot;; it tells us something about the way Fonzie is. The second tells us what he&#039;s doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not about who is doing the action, I think, but about what the action is. In the first, the verb is “to be”; it tells us something about the way Fonzie is. The second tells us what he’s doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProfessorWalrus</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003/comment-page-1#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessorWalrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/08/word-passive-voice-highlighting-revisited-now-for-word-2003#comment-368</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Fonz was standing against the wall.&quot; &quot;The Fonz stood against the wall.&quot; are both active. In both situations &#039;The Fonz&#039; is the one doing the action. Neither of them are passive, at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The Fonz was standing against the wall.” “The Fonz stood against the wall.” are both active. In both situations ‘The Fonz’ is the one doing the action. Neither of them are passive, at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

