<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving to Linux: Working with Text (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/10/moving-to-linux-working-with-text-part-1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/10/moving-to-linux-working-with-text-part-1</link>
	<description>Tools, Tips, and Technology for Productive Writers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:31:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moving to Linux: Working with Text (Part 1) &#124; FRANCESCO DI FUSCO</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/10/moving-to-linux-working-with-text-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>Moving to Linux: Working with Text (Part 1) &#124; FRANCESCO DI FUSCO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/?p=475#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>[...] Moving to Linux: Working with Text (Part 1). Share this:TwitterFacebookStumbleUponPrintEmailLinkedInLike this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Moving to Linux: Working with Text (Part 1). Share this:TwitterFacebookStumbleUponPrintEmailLinkedInLike this:LikeBe the first to like this […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Copywriter Underground</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/10/moving-to-linux-working-with-text-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>The Copywriter Underground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/?p=475#comment-579</guid>
		<description>Bluefish doesn&#039;t require much beyond a name to create a project, and neither does the Gedit version (you need to install the &quot;sessions&quot; plugin in Gedit). 

I haven&#039;t explored the older editors yet (vim, emacs, etc), though emac&#039;s ability to send &amp; receive email raises the issue of an &quot;online word worker&quot; editor that offers modules/widgets/plugins for posting to blogs, tweets, chat, email, etc. 

These days, that would account for 70% of my writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bluefish doesn’t require much beyond a name to create a project, and neither does the Gedit version (you need to install the “sessions” plugin in Gedit). </p>
<p>I haven’t explored the older editors yet (vim, emacs, etc), though emac’s ability to send &amp; receive email raises the issue of an “online word worker” editor that offers modules/widgets/plugins for posting to blogs, tweets, chat, email, etc. </p>
<p>These days, that would account for 70% of my writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acpkendo</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/10/moving-to-linux-working-with-text-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>acpkendo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/?p=475#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Thanks!

I could see the use for something between a word processor and a text editor, although at this point I&#039;d also love to see ODT export for txt2tags.

I read your post too--turns out kate has the same concept, only generalized in its &quot;Sessions&quot; support.  I don&#039;t know if Bluefish makes you enter a bunch of information about web servers and such (I know Quanta would need some of that to create a project).  The neat thing about kate is that there&#039;s integration with the desktop, e.g., a &quot;Kate Sessions&quot; applet that you can park on your dashboard/menu bar in KDE4.  So once you log in you&#039;re literall one click away from any of your project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>I could see the use for something between a word processor and a text editor, although at this point I’d also love to see ODT export for txt2tags.</p>
<p>I read your post too–turns out kate has the same concept, only generalized in its “Sessions” support.  I don’t know if Bluefish makes you enter a bunch of information about web servers and such (I know Quanta would need some of that to create a project).  The neat thing about kate is that there’s integration with the desktop, e.g., a “Kate Sessions” applet that you can park on your dashboard/menu bar in KDE4.  So once you log in you’re literall one click away from any of your project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Copywriter Underground</title>
		<link>http://www.writerstechnology.com/2008/10/moving-to-linux-working-with-text-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>The Copywriter Underground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 02:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writerstechnology.com/?p=475#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Great post. I&#039;m gravitating towards the use of text editors for my online writing, and in fact, just posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/10/31/the-modern-online-copywriter-why-a-programmers-editor-might-be-in-your-future/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a short article about using programmer&#039;s editors&lt;/a&gt; because the &quot;project&quot; function simplifies . 

My choices are Bluefish and Gedit (Ubunut Linux), and while neither is perfect, they&#039;re a better fit for online work than word processors like Open Office and Word.

With the growing prevalence of online copywriting, I think a new class of word processor is needed - something that quickly and easily generates html-tagged copy, incorporates all the modern niceties, yet also posts blog articles, tweets, etc, (perhaps in console windows). 

I can think of a few more goodies, and hope the next generation of word processor shows up soon (and that it shows on Linux first).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I’m gravitating towards the use of text editors for my online writing, and in fact, just posted <a href="http://copywriterunderground.com/2008/10/31/the-modern-online-copywriter-why-a-programmers-editor-might-be-in-your-future/" rel="nofollow">a short article about using programmer’s editors</a> because the “project” function simplifies . </p>
<p>My choices are Bluefish and Gedit (Ubunut Linux), and while neither is perfect, they’re a better fit for online work than word processors like Open Office and Word.</p>
<p>With the growing prevalence of online copywriting, I think a new class of word processor is needed — something that quickly and easily generates html-tagged copy, incorporates all the modern niceties, yet also posts blog articles, tweets, etc, (perhaps in console windows). </p>
<p>I can think of a few more goodies, and hope the next generation of word processor shows up soon (and that it shows on Linux first).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

